RODE PODCASTER VS PROCASTER FULL

There’s no question about it: the addition of the Rode Procasters to our studio setup has helped improve our overall sound quality. You can also use the Rode PSM1 shock mount to help isolate the mic from external vibrations. You can mount it to a mic stand using the Rode RM2, which usually comes in the box with the Procaster as standard. It definitely isn’t a mic that should be hand-held. You will need a boom arm or mic stand to use the Rode Procaster.

RODE PODCASTER VS PROCASTER FULL

You can extend this to a full ten years, free of charge, by registering your purchase details with Rode. The Procaster comes with a twelve month warranty. On Amazon UK, you can buy the mic on its own for £131. You can currently buy a brand new Rode Procaster on Amazon for $349 – this is part of a bundle deal that includes the Rode PSA 1 Swivel Boom Arm and Shock Mount. It’s 214mm long with a 53mm diameter, and comes in black. It looks and feels like a really solid bit of kit. It’s had no cleaning or post-processing applied to it. Here’s a sound sample recorded using the 2i2 in the studio. With that said though, we’ve had great results using it through the Yamaha MG10 and the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2. The Procaster is quite gain-hungry, so you need to have your input recording levels turned up a wee bit more than usual to run it. But you actually want to talk down it from the top instead, as shown in the photo here. When you initially set it up, you could easily be fooled into thinking you talk into the neck of the mic.

The Procaster has an internal popshield built into it, though if you’re someone who pops the mic a lot, it won’t hurt to utilise an external pop filter too. Unlike its cousin, the Rode Podcaster, it isn’t a USB mic that can be plugged directly into your computer. It’s an XLR microphone, which means you’ll need an additional piece of equipment like a mixer, preamp, or digital recorder to run it. For a more in-depth look at polar patterns, here’s our guide to them. The Rode Procaster has a Cardioid polar pattern, which means it focuses on the sound in the area in front of the microphone. This is aided by the fact that it’s also good at rejecting unwanted sounds from around the microphone. Naturally, this can be a con as well as a pro, depending on the environment you’re working in.ĭespite being in the dynamic bracket though, the Procaster does a great job of recording the nuances of a vocal performance. The simplest distinction is that the former are more sensitive, and will pick up more detail in the audio you’re recording. This term relates to how it’s actually built and how it functions.Ĭondenser mics are the traditional alternative to dynamics. This makes it extremely popular in the world of podcasting and voice-over work. The Rode Procaster is a broadcast quality dynamic microphone designed to record professional sounding vocals. Let’s take a look over this mic and see if it’s something that might be a good option for you and your own podcast. Suddenly having two in the studio to play with was as good an opportunity as any to fix that though. Until now though, we’ve never actually put out a review of the Rode Procaster. Rode are an audio industry heavyweight, and each of their products seems to come with a universally good reputation. Our overall kit is made up by a good number of their products. We recently bought two Rode Procaster mics as part of a studio overhaul here at The Podcast Host.

Rode podcaster vs procaster